Beitragvon Cwali » 13. Juni 2002, 11:14
Hallo Ulrich Roth,
> 1. Auf der Website des Autors Corné van Moorsel
> http://www.euronet.nl/users/cornesab/
> ist von "Street Soccer" gar nichts zu sehen, stattdessen aber
> ein Spiel namens "Coach", das wie eine Groß-Version davon mit
> 2x11 Spielern aussieht.
> Weiß jemand, ob das der Vorläufer oder eine Weiterentwicklung
> von "Street Soccer" ist? Nach der Kurzbeschreibung, in der
> von realistischen Elementen wie gelben/roten Karten,
> Eckbällen und Verletzungen u.ä. die Rede ist, würde ich auf
> letzteres tippen. Denkbar wäre allerdings auch, dass "Coach"
> zwecks Massentauglichkeit radikal verschlankt wurde.
See http://www.cwali.com/streetsoccer/streetsoccer.htm for StreetSoccer.
Coach und StreetSoccer war parallel-entwicklungen.
The first version 20 years ago was 5 against 5 pawns like StreetSoccer has.
Coach is more a simulation of soccercompetition-matches, with yellow/red
cards, injuries, exchanging players during the match, making a complete
selection for a tournament, and is especially liked as simulation.
Coach has long rules and takes much more time than StreetSoccer.
During one match of Coach you can play 3 or 4 matches of StreetSoccer.
In Coach you have more choices to make, that gives more tactical choices
per match but in the total score of 3 or 4 StreetSoccer matches together
the influence of your choices is bigger than in one match of Coach.
So StreetSoccer is probably the most tactical version per minute playtime.
> 2. Zu "Street Soccer" selbst:
> Die Spielregeln kenne ich nur aus diversen Beschreibungen,
> also wohl nicht vollständig. Ich nehme mal an, dass es nicht
> erlaubt ist, zwei Spieler auf die Felder direkt vor dem
> eigenen Tor zu stellen.
> Gibt es da noch andere Einschränkungen? Mit den 5 Figuren
> könnte man doch einen beeindruckenden Catenaccio errichten.
> Oder wird solches durch den Zugzwang (d.h. Pflicht die
> gewürfelten Augen zu verbraten) erschwert?
> Hat jemand Erfahrungen mit extremen Defensiv-Strategien?
A few "anti-kill-joy"rules in the rulebook make that you can't block the
ways to the goal too much:
- Only the goalie in the goal, so in one of the two spaces for the goal.
(The goalie doesn't have to stay in those spaces.)
- Only one outfielder within his OWN 'penalty-area' (that's in one of the two
spaces in front of the 2 spaces for the keeper).
(You can walk in the 'penalty-area' of your opponent.)
- No 4 players of one team next to the ball (because then the other team
can't reach the ball ever anymore) and no 3 players next to the ball if the
ball is in a corner-space (because then the other team can't shoot the ball
there to another space (he can reach the ball because you may walk on
the spaces outside the lines)).
And at the start you place at least one player on your opponent's half.
Extremely defensive play doesn't seem to be a good way to try to win,
in my opinion, even when you are leading. If you are leading in the match
or in the tournament, you probably play more defensive, and then the other
player has to play more offensive. (By the way: I think it's good to hold
some patience when you need to score a goal, I mean offensive doesn't
mean that all players go to the opponent's side, you can hold your opponent
more under pressure sometimes when you have positions with which you
can counter your opponent's counter-attack quick.)
In princip you can score a goal in a turn in which the ball is completely at
the other end of the field (depending on how all players stand). So having
all players on your own field-half, will not work well.
The only situation in which a match could be boring is when both coaches
don't 'want' to score goals. But then the crowd starts to whistle!
In that way it's like real soccer (second half Austria-Germany 1982?).
Groeten,
Corné