Beitragvon Cwali » 21. Januar 2008, 21:03
Hi,
> was soll man über "Gipsy King" schon groß schreiben?
So easy that there is not much to write about. That's right.
> Ich habe es in Essen ausprobiert und fand es wenig innovativ, weil es mir "Titicaca" viel zu ähnlich ist.
To avoid misunderstandings: these games are 'uncomparable'.
The number order on the board is similar to *Titicaca*. But it is a very different type of game. Merging countries was the main idea of *Titicaca*, that is not a part in *Gipsy King*, bidding not too. I didn't compare the games because it would make players expect an other type of game. It's so different that refering to Titicaca will put you on the wrong leg anyway. People who compared it first often told me after playing that it is a completely different experience.
> Wenn man "Titicaca" nicht kennt, mag man allerdings "Gipsy King" durchaus interessant finden.
I experience that players who didn't like *Titicaca* do like *Gipsy King*. It is a game to play with young children and grandparents at the same time. I would not advise that with Titicaca. :)
> Thread nahezu alleine bestreiten kann - von jetzt zwölf
> Beiträgen sind 9 von Dir)
I wrote in the first message: I will place it in chapters. With the chapters I meant the Beitragen with different titles behind the first message. More clear than one long message, one there are replies.
Grusse,
Corne
PS: I forgot to write about plans for new games this year. But nothing is certain yet, and when I write something plans often turn out to change much. I tried many prototypes last time. I think it will be again a fast, easy but deep game. Okay, so I don't have news about this yet, just can't hold secrets.